<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Undocumented Windows cryptography</title>
	<link>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/</link>
	<description>Think it easy</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 03:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ilya</title>
		<link>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-9193</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 08:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-9193</guid>
					<description>@student

The purpose of reconnaissance ("information gathering") is to learn the target and identify the attack points. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconnaissance

You may google for the rest :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@student</p>
<p>The purpose of reconnaissance (&#8221;information gathering&#8221;) is to learn the target and identify the attack points.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconnaissance" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconnaissance</a></p>
<p>You may google for the rest :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: student</title>
		<link>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-9180</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 04:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-9180</guid>
					<description>and 3 good sources of information for this purpose- reconnaissance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and 3 good sources of information for this purpose- reconnaissance
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: student</title>
		<link>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-9179</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 04:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-9179</guid>
					<description>thanx 4 the other links but i already had that i need more help... another question:
what are the objectives of an attacker performing reconnaissance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanx 4 the other links but i already had that i need more help&#8230; another question:<br />
what are the objectives of an attacker performing reconnaissance?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: student</title>
		<link>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-9178</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 04:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-9178</guid>
					<description>this is the question:
compare the way UNIX passwords and Windows Lan Manager passwords are encrypted with a block cipher. Explain why seemingly similar algorithms have such different properties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is the question:<br />
compare the way UNIX passwords and Windows Lan Manager passwords are encrypted with a block cipher. Explain why seemingly similar algorithms have such different properties.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ilya</title>
		<link>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-9175</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 03:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-9175</guid>
					<description>@student:

http://www.hmug.org/man/3/crypt.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LM_hash
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTLM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitLocker_Drive_Encryption
and Google of course :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@student:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hmug.org/man/3/crypt.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.hmug.org/man/3/crypt.php</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LM_hash" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LM_hash</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTLM" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTLM</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitLocker_Drive_Encryption" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitLocker_Drive_Encryption</a><br />
and Google of course :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: student</title>
		<link>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-9170</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 01:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-9170</guid>
					<description>hey can sum1 help me...i hv this huge asssignment due 2mrw .. im doin my IT degree...i need information on the UNIX and Windows encryption in terms of passwords and the use of hashing and block ciphers in both.... thanks alot...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey can sum1 help me&#8230;i hv this huge asssignment due 2mrw .. im doin my IT degree&#8230;i need information on the UNIX and Windows encryption in terms of passwords and the use of hashing and block ciphers in both&#8230;. thanks alot&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ilya</title>
		<link>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-105</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 07:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-105</guid>
					<description>@Jeff:

Why do you think so? Is it because of SHA_CONTEXT structure of what? From what I see there is nothing firm enough to support such conclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeff:</p>
<p>Why do you think so? Is it because of SHA_CONTEXT structure of what? From what I see there is nothing firm enough to support such conclusion.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-95</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-95</guid>
					<description>Whoops... www.cryptopp.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops&#8230; <a href="http://www.cryptopp.com" rel="nofollow">www.cryptopp.com</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-94</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-94</guid>
					<description>Microsoft is using Crypto++ code. The are aiding in the Library's FIPS certification.

See www.crytpopp.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft is using Crypto++ code. The are aiding in the Library&#8217;s FIPS certification.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.crytpopp.com" rel="nofollow">www.crytpopp.com</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ilya</title>
		<link>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-66</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.literatecode.com/2006/12/18/undocumented-windows-cryptography/#comment-66</guid>
					<description>How lovely!
Is it just Wednesday, or you are like this 24/7/365?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How lovely!<br />
Is it just Wednesday, or you are like this 24/7/365?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
