<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrootme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.literatecode.com/2009/11/10/chrootm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.literatecode.com/2009/11/10/chrootm/</link>
	<description>Security, Programming and Beyond</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Myron</title>
		<link>http://www.literatecode.com/2009/11/10/chrootm/comment-page-1/#comment-15920</link>
		<dc:creator>Myron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.literatecode.com/?p=138#comment-15920</guid>
		<description>Google Chrome runs in multiple processes.  If I understand it correctly, it has a main process and then each tab in the browser is running in a seperate process.  This means there needs to be some IPC mechanisms setup between the processes.  This is probably why it is touching some Kernel APIs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Chrome runs in multiple processes.  If I understand it correctly, it has a main process and then each tab in the browser is running in a seperate process.  This means there needs to be some IPC mechanisms setup between the processes.  This is probably why it is touching some Kernel APIs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glysbaysb</title>
		<link>http://www.literatecode.com/2009/11/10/chrootm/comment-page-1/#comment-15893</link>
		<dc:creator>glysbaysb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.literatecode.com/?p=138#comment-15893</guid>
		<description>More probaly to defend itself from banking trojans.
Most of these inject Parts of there own code into the browser to hijack data. This can be avoided by hooking these</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More probaly to defend itself from banking trojans.<br />
Most of these inject Parts of there own code into the browser to hijack data. This can be avoided by hooking these</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberto</title>
		<link>http://www.literatecode.com/2009/11/10/chrootm/comment-page-1/#comment-15885</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.literatecode.com/?p=138#comment-15885</guid>
		<description>Might it be because of the rivalry between Google and Microsoft?  Actually, "...some software may use rootkit techniques to hide from third-party scanners to detect tampering or attempted breakins..." (cited from Wikipedia).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might it be because of the rivalry between Google and Microsoft?  Actually, &#8220;&#8230;some software may use rootkit techniques to hide from third-party scanners to detect tampering or attempted breakins&#8230;&#8221; (cited from Wikipedia).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
